2023

  • Parmar, J., & Rothermund, K. (2023). Nothing else matters: Stimulus–response binding and retrieval is independent of affective consequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. x(x).   doi:  10.1037/xlm0001288
  • Mocke, V., Benini, E., Parmar, J., Schiltenwolf, M., & Kunde, W. (2023). What is behind partial repetition costs? Event-files do not fully occupy bound feature codes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, x(x).   doi:  10.3758/s13423-023-02253-x

2022

  • Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Frings, C., Pfister, R. (2022). What is left after an error? Towards a comprehensive account of goal-based binding and retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.   doi:  10.3758/s13414-022-02609-w
  • Foerster, A., Schiltenwolf, M., Dignath, D., & Pfister, R. (2022). Binding error-induced control states. Journal of Cognition 5 (1), 23. doi:  10.5334/joc.212
  • Foerster, A., Steinhauser, M., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2022). Error cancellation. Royal Society Open Science 9 (3). doi: 10.1098/rsos.210397
  • Giesen, C.G., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus-response bindings in online settings when interacting with a human or computer partner. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02058-4
  • Giesen, C. G., Husken, L., & Schneider, D. (2022). Retrieval effects for observationally acquired stimulus-response bindings in participants with high and low autistic traits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000980
  • Mocke, V., Holzmann, P., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2022). Beyond left and right: Binding and retrieval of spatial and temporal features of planned actions. Journal of Cognition, 5 (1). doi: 10.5334/joc.197
  • Parmar, J., Foerster, A., Pfister, R., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Frankly, My Error, I Don't Give a Damn: Retrieval of Goal-Based but not Coactivation-Based Bindings after Erroneous Responses. Journal of Cognition, 5 (1), 34. doi: 10.5334/joc.224
  • Pfister, R., Bogon, J., Foerster, A., Kunde, W., & Moeller, B. (2022). Binding and retrieval of response durations: Subtle evidence for episodic processing of continuous movement features. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 23. doi: 10.5334/joc.212
  • Schmalbrock, P., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2022). Pooling it all together–the role of distractor pool size on stimulus-response binding. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1-12. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2022.2026363
  • Schmalbrock, P., Kiesel, A., & Frings, C. (in press). What belongs together retrieves together – The role of perceptual grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval. Journal of Cognition.
  • Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., & Mayr, S. (2022). Saliency determines the integration of contextual information into stimulus-response episodes. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02428-5
  • Qiu, R., Möller, M., Koch, I., & Mayr. S. (2022). Inter-Trial Variability of Context Influences the Binding Structure in a Stimulus-Response Episode. Journal of Cognition. doi: 10.5334/joc.215
  • Schiltenwolf, M., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2022). No temporal decay of cognitive control in the congruency sequence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001159
  • Benini, E., Koch, I., Mayr, S., Frings, C., & Philipp, A. M. (2022). Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, x(x). doi: 10.1177/17470218221128546
  • Benini, E., Koch, I., Mayr, S., Frings, C., & Philipp, A. M. (2022). Contextual features of the cue enter episodic bindings in task switching. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 1–17.
    doi:  10.5334/joc.220

2021

  • Dignath, D., & Kiesel, A. (2021). Further evidence for the binding and retrieval of control-states from the flanker task. Experimental Psychology, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000529
  • Dignath, D., Kiesel, A., Schiltenwolf, M., & Hazeltine, E. (2021). Multiple routes to control in the prime-target task: Congruence sequence effects emerge due to modulation of irrelevant prime activity and utilization of temporal order information. Journal of Cognition, 4 (1). 10.5334/joc.143
  • Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Huffman, G., Kunde, W., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2021). The human cognitive system corrects traces of error commission on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi: 10.1037/xge0001139
  • Foerster, A., Rothermund, K., Parmar, J. J., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2021). Goal-based binding of irrelevant stimulus features for action slips. Experimental Psychology, 68 (4), 206-213. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000525
  • Giesen, C. G. & Frings, (2021). Not so social after all: Video-based acquisition of observational stimulus-response bindings. Acta Psychologica, 217 (103330). doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103330
  • Giesen, C., Nagel, L., Rudolph, M., & Rothermund, K. (2021). Smaller than expected: Effects of imitative action regulation after experiencing social exclusion. Experimental Psychology. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000516
  • Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2021). Response-response bindings do not decay for six seconds after integration: A case for bindings’ relevance in hierarchical action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47 (4), 508–517. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000897
  • Pastötter, B., Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2021). Watching the brain as it (un)binds: Beta synchronization relates to distractor-response binding. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33, 1581-1594. doi: 10.1162/jocn
  • Pfister, R., & Foerster, A. (2021). How to measure post-error slowing: The case of pre-error speeding. Behavior Research Methods 54 (1), 435-443. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01631-4
  • Schmalbrock, P., & Frings, C. (2021). Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus–response integration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1-10. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02361-7
  • Schmalbrock, P., Laub, R., & Frings, C. (2021). Integrating salience and action–Increased integration strength through salience. Visual Cognition, 29 (2), 91-104. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1871455

2020

  • Dignath, D., Eder, A. B., Steinhauser, M., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis—an integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27 (2), 193-216. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9
  • Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 375-387. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
  • Frings, C., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R. & Philipp, A. (2020). Merkmalsintegration und Abruf als wichtige Prozesse der Handlungssteuerung – eine Paradigmen-übergreifende Perspektive [Feature integration and retrieval as core processes in action control - a cross-paradigm perspective]. Psychologische Rundschau, 71, 1-14. doi: 10.1026/0033-3042/a000423
  • Giesen, C. G., Schmidt, J.R., & Rothermund, K. (2020). The law of recency: An episodic stimulus-response retrieval account of habit acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927
  • Kandalowski, S., Seibold, J., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2020). Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 1632-1643. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01931-0
  • Mocke, V., Weller, L., Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Kunde, W. (2020). Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82 (8), 3811-3831. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02123-x
  • Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2020). Remote binding counts: Measuring distractor-response binding effects online. Psychological Research. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01413-1
  • Schmidt, J. R., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73 (5),739-761. doi: 10.1177/1747021820906397
  • Schreckenbach, F., Rothermund, K., & Koranyi, N. (2020). Quantity matters: The frequency of deception influences automatic memory retrieval effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73 (11), 1774-1783. doi: 10.1177/1747021820924652
  • Schreckenbach, F., Sprengholz, P., Rothermund, K., & Koranyi, N. (2020). How to remember something you didn’t say: Lies of omission can be stored and retrieved from memory. Experimental Psychology, 67 (6), 364-372. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000504
  • Straub, E., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2020). Cognitive control of emotional distraction—Valence-specific or general? Cognition and Emotion, 34 (4), 807-821. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1666799

2019

  • Dignath, D., Johannsen, L., Hommel, B., & Kiesel, A. (2019). Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45 (9), 1265-1270. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000673
  • Möller, M., Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2019). Inhibition of irrelevant response codes is affected by matching target-distractor modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45 (2), 189-208. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000599
  • Moeller, B. & Frings, C. (2019). Lost time: Bindings do not represent temporal order information. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26, 325-331. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1493-y
  • Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019). Binding processes in the control of non-routine action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45 (9), 1135-1145. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000665
  • Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019). From simple to complex actions: Response-Response bindings as a new approach to action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 174-183. doi: 10.1037/xge0000483
  • Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019). Response-response binding across effector-set switches. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1974-1979. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01669-8
  • Moeller, B., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Frings, C. (2019). Selective binding of stimulus, response, and effect features. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26 (5), 1627-1632. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01646-1
  • Pfister, R. (2019). Effect-based action control with body-related effects: Implications for empirical approaches to ideomotor action control. Psychological Review, 126 (1), 153-161. doi: 10.1037/rev0000140
  • Pfister, R., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2019). The role of congruency for distractor-response binding: A caveat. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 15 (2), 127–132. doi: 10.5709/acp-0262-1
  • Schuch, S., Dignath, D., Steinhauser, M., & Janczyk, M. (2019). Monitoring and control in multitasking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26 (1), 222-240. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1512-z
  • Schwarz, K. A., Weller, L., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2019). Connecting action control and agency: Does action-effect binding affect temporal binding? Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 76, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102833
  • Weller, L., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2019). Sociomotor actions: Anticipated partner responses are primarily represented in terms of spatial, not anatomical features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45 (8), 1104-1118. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000658
  • Wesslein, A., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Giesen, C. (2019). Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81 (3), 809-822. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01655-7
  • Zhang, J., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2019). Affective influence on context-specific proportion congruent (CSPC) effect: Neutral or affective facial expressions as context stimuli. Experimental Psychology, 66 (1), 86-97. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000436
About
Team
Labs
Contact
Privacy Policy